<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pushing Back The Banks &#8211; Banks Should Be Boring</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moneywell.co.uk/blog/banking/pushing-back-the-banks-banks-should-be-boring/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moneywell.co.uk/blog/banking/pushing-back-the-banks-banks-should-be-boring</link>
	<description>Personal Finance Guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:58:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Monevator</title>
		<link>http://www.moneywell.co.uk/blog/banking/pushing-back-the-banks-banks-should-be-boring/comment-page-1#comment-25595</link>
		<dc:creator>Monevator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 20:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneywell.co.uk/blog/?p=240#comment-25595</guid>
		<description>Hmm, with respect, be careful what you wish for. I agree they need to reign in their successes, but in the 1970s you could only get a mortgage on bended knee, and all kinds of debts were hugely more expensive.

If the banks can&#039;t make their profits one way they&#039;ll make them another. That&#039;s not at all to disagree with your main point - I agree - but I think there&#039;s a middle ground.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, with respect, be careful what you wish for. I agree they need to reign in their successes, but in the 1970s you could only get a mortgage on bended knee, and all kinds of debts were hugely more expensive.</p>
<p>If the banks can&#8217;t make their profits one way they&#8217;ll make them another. That&#8217;s not at all to disagree with your main point &#8211; I agree &#8211; but I think there&#8217;s a middle ground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
